All posts by Webmaster

Blog, Pro-Life

Infanticide in Puerto Rico and now New York

WARNING!

This post contains Extremely Graphic Photos of Torture by Abortion!

You have been warned

Proceed at your own risk.

/


And typically when the abortion procedure is started we typically know that the fetus is still alive because either we can feel it move as we’re making our initial grasps or if we’re using some ultrasound visualization when we actually see a heartbeat as we’re starting the procedure. It’s not unusual at the start of the procedures that a limb is acquired first and that that limb is brought through the cervix and even out of the vagina prior to disarticulation and prior to anything having been done that would have caused the fetal demise up to that point.

The U.N.  has long  supported countries that promote sterilization and forced abortion. In fact, UNFPA actually helped to design the Chinese 30-year-old “one child”  program,” which has always included forced abortion and sterilization.”

In February 2013, the United Nations Human Rights Council released a report in which the Committee against Torture (CAT) equates LACK of access to abortion as “torture and ill-treatment” of woman. This  logic is inverted.  As can be seen from the graphics below, it is not the woman who is being tortured.

Puerto Rico has long followed the dictate of the United Nations by ignoring it’s constitution by permitting infanticide of the unborn up to the moment  of birth.

More recently New York has followed the example Puerto Rico this by enshrining this practise as a constitutional right.

The implications of this pernicious decision can be seen in the following photos.

WARNING!

Viewer Discretion Advised

You have been warned.

infanticide1

Do not be deceived
into believing
that the “blobs”
they have been killing
were not babies.

Education

ESSA and the Vanishing Puerto Rico Content Standards

After multiple decades of following failed education philosophies which have reduced literacy rates, increased learning “disabilities”, produced a highly disaffected student body, and fragmented families, Puerto Rico has agreed (been bribed) into ceding total control of its education system to the US federal government by adopting the controversial “Every Student Succeeds Act” (ESSA). Although this decision was taken some years ago, the government is only now holding public hearings on some aspects of this issue. In order that the public remain in darkness concerning the rather mediocre content standards, the PR-DOE, now under the leadership of the ex-Obama bureaucrat Julia B. Keleher, has “vanished” the aforementioned documents [1] from its webpage. It would seemingly prefer that the public remain ignorant of the lack of purpose behind the so-called “content” taught to students. In reality, these “hearings” are merely a tool to rubber stamp what is already a fait-accompli.

Indeed, ESSA, which is oriented to social indoctrination rather than education, will only worsen the current crisis in education. By data mining, ESSA aims to enforce conformity – it is designed to condition students to accept and propagate radical liberal postmodern “values,” thereby producing a population of non-thinkers. This has long been the unstated aim of government schools. According to Gatto [2], such schools produce:

“Young people indifferent to the adult world and to the future; indifferent to almost everything except the diversion of toys and violence? Rich or poor, schoolchildren cannot concentrate on anything for very long. They have a poor sense of time past and to come; they are mistrustful of intimacy (like the children of divorce they really are); they hate solitude, are cruel, materialistic, dependent, passive, violent, timid in the face of the unexpected, addicted to distraction.”

  1. PR-DOE page – Retrieved from Internet Archive.
  2. Mathematics Standards of Puerto Rico – Analysis and Recommendations, Philip Pennance, 2002.
  3. Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling, John Taylor Gatto, 2017.
  4. Like Obamacare, Obamacore is another Power Grab.
  5. Mathematics and Senate Project 171
  6. Duke Pesta on the dangers of government schools

Blog, Video

A Comment on the Movie ‘Churchill’

Video

A recent movie directed by Jonathan Teplitzky portrays Churchill as a senile, depressed and bumbling fool who was actively opposed to the Normandy landings. This is totally fake history. In reality, Churchill was pro-active in the planning of the D-Day landings.

For example, an early idea for temporary harbours had been sketched by Winston Churchill as early as 1917. In 1942, Churchill issued a memo “Piers for use on beaches” advocating such a construction for the landings in France. Soon after, Vice-Admiral John Hughes-Hallett, with the backing of Churchill, declared that if a port could not be captured, then one should be taken across the Channel.

In the autumn of 1942, the Chief of Combined Operations, Vice-Admiral Lord Louis Mountbatten, outlined the requirements for such a construction.

This video shows the design which was actually implemented.

Unlike Mary Queen of Scots in the song below, Churchill actually succeeded in getting to France.

Music: To France – by Mike Oldfield

Blog, Religion

The Andalusian Illusion – Book Review


By Anne Barbeau Gardiner
Source: New Oxford Review

The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain. By Darío Fernández-Morera. ISI Books. 358 pages. $29.95.

American universities with departments of Islamic Studies or Middle Eastern Studies often receive funding from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Turkey. Critics have documented the way this funding has served the political agendas of those nations by inducing scholars in the field to teach blatant myths. For example, it is now common for such scholars to claim that Spain was conquered peacefully in A.D. 711 by treaties with the Moors, who then lifted Islamic Spain, or al-Andalus, out of the so-called Dark Ages and contributed significantly to the development of European civilization. These same scholars can be found postulating that Islamic Spain was an exemplar of religious tolerance and diversity, and that women there had a surprising degree of freedom. Nothing could be further from the truth. In this well-documented book, Darío Fernández-Morera, an associate professor in the departments of Spanish and Portuguese at Northwestern University, shows how Spain was, in fact, conquered in the most barbaric manner and ruled for centuries under an intolerant legal system called Malikism, a form of Sharia. Continue reading at the New Oxford Review.